Pd 1 Inhibitor Mesothelioma

108 views

Outcomes of anti-PD-1 therapy in mesothelioma and correlation with PD-L1 expression.

 
Pd-1-Inhibitor-Mesothelioma Pd 1 Inhibitor Mesothelioma

 
Methods: Patients (pts) with unresectable pleural or peritoneal mm treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies were included. Data was collected retrospectively. Radiological response was assessed using RECIST 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. PD-L1 expression was assessed with IHC clone E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology). PD-L1 positivity was defined as membranous expression on tumour cells: > 5% for PD-L1+ and > 50% for PD-L1hi.

Results: Forty-six pts were treated between July 2015 and January 2017. Median age was 66.5 years, ECOG PS was 0/1 in 3/46 (7%) and 35/46 (76%) respectively. Most were male (83%), and 43/46 (93%) had ≥1 prior therapy, with a median of 2 (range 0 – 5). The predominant histology was epithelioid (n = 32/46; 70%). Pembrolizumab was used in 45/46 and BGB-A317 (a PD-L1 antibody) in 1 pt. Of the 46 pts, the overall response rate (ORR) was 15% (7 PR) with 15/46 (33%) achieving stable disease, giving a DCR of 44%. Progression was seen in 24/46 (52%). Median OS for the entire cohort was 8.0 months (95% CI: 2.3 – 11.9). Median duration of response was not yet reached (range 1.5 -19.8). PD-L1 testing was performed in 14 samples, with PD-L1+ in 5 (36%) and PD-L1hi in 4 (29%). The ORR was 40% (2 PR, 3 SD) with PD-L1+, 50% (2 PR, 2 SD) with PD-L1hi and 22% (2/9 patients) with negative expression. PFS and OS were greater with both PD-L1+ (PFS HR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.05 – 1.32, p = 0.10) and PD-L1hi(PFS HR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.02 – 1.47, p = 0.11). PD-L1+ positivity remained a borderline predictor of improved survival on multivariate analysis (p = 0.06). Complete PD-L1 analysis will be presented at the meeting.

Conclusions: PD-1 targeted therapy demonstrated a clinically significant response rate in this cohort of mm patients. Initial analysis suggests PD-L1 expression is correlated with improved response and survival. *)

*) source: http://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.8514

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *